U.S. DOJ will reportedly oppose T-Mobile/Sprint merger despite FCC nod

While the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) appears likely to approve the proposed merger of third- and fourth-place wireless carriers T-Mobile and Sprint, the Department of Justice is reportedly still leaning against approval due to unresolved antitrust concerns, Bloomberg reports. As it has potential impacts on both telecommunications and broader consumer competition, the $26.5 billion merger requires sign-offs from both federal agencies, and even their approval wouldn’t foreclose the prospect of state-level opposition.

Earlier today, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai signaled his support for the deal after over a year of fact-finding and public comments, noting that the commission had secured the carriers’ agreement to quickly make 5G services available to nearly all U.S. customers — 97% of the population within three years — with multi-billion-dollar penalties for shortcomings. But as Bloomberg notes, Justice Department antitrust head Makan Delrahim could still oppose the deal if he finds that the merger would hurt competition in the wireless sector, and would raise consumer prices.

In addition to making coverage commitments, T-Mobile and Sprint have committed to divesting prepaid carrier Boost Mobile to win regulatory approval, and to holding current service prices constant for a period of three years — a pledge that was widely taken to mean that the carriers’ 5G prices would not increase compared to their 4G prices. However, opponents of the deal have suggested that the carriers could merely introduce new services at higher prices, and that the reduction from four to three carriers will inevitably lead to price increases in poorly served areas.

Though reports regarding Justice Department and carrier talks have previously indicated staff lawyer-level opposition to the deal, and highlighted potential hurdles to winning approval, T-Mobile and Sprint officials have previously said that characterizations of the discussions were inaccurate. Assuming today’s report is correct, the carriers could agree to additional pricing and/or divestment terms to satisfy the agency’s antitrust and competition concerns, enabling the merger to move forward.

Content sourced fromTNW

*This section only applies to third party rss feed users*
Kashmir Broadcasting Corporation allows the use of RSS Feeds, but with our content usage we expect that credit is given, but in the event that it is not. This content policy annotation will act as a credit towards KBC (Kashmir Broadcasting Corporation) Please visit for more news and articles — we can not justify what is written on a third party site, as the content can be altered to their specification, if something is not authentic as it should be please visit and look for the original content. if it is no longer there then it can no longer be associated with Kashmir Broadcasting Corporation and if the content on a third party site has been altered to the point of offence or deemed inappropriate please report it to KBC via email: or fill the submission form on kbc’s website: with the details of the site and article heading — Thank You

Website —
FaceBook —
Twitter —
YouTube —
Instagram —

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker
%d bloggers like this: