The US Court for the Southern District of Florida has dismissed the case of initial coin offering (ICO) fraud against DJ Khaled and boxer Floyd Mayweather.
The court decided that despite Khaled and Mayweather shilled defunct cryptocurrency firm CentraTech (and its associated ICO of CTR tokens) on their social media profiles, they did not play a big enough role in its promotion to warrant further legal action.
“The Plaintiff’s complaint fails to establish that Mayweather [and Khaled] ‘successfully solicited’ the Plaintiffs to purchase CTR Tokens,” according to court documents.
Mayweather and Khaled both posted two tweets related to CTR tokens, one of which encouraged their followers to buy into the ICO. However, the courts state this is the closest the pair ever came to soliciting the tokens for sale.
Seen as it was a series of indirect tweets, the courts could not ascertain whether this successfully encouraged followers to buy CTR tokens. What’s more, courts could not determine if their followers had even seen the tweets, or if the pair had any direct contact with purchasers.
In some cases, investors bought CTR before Mayweather and Khalid were even involved in the project.
For Mayweather and Khaled to have been found guilty, the purchasers (plaintiffs) needed to prove a direct relationship with the defendants. Seen as prosecutors couldn’t prove any such relationship, the court has dismissed the case.
Last November, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fined Khaled and Mayweather for their failure to disclose the payments they received to promote CentraTech.
At the time, Mayweather agreed to pay $600,000 in penalties, and DJ Khaled ended up paying a $150,000 fine.
One in one out
Indeed, while it might be good news for Mayweather and Khaled on this occasion, it’s not a great week for American comedian Kevin Hart. The world’s second highest paid comedian is being put under the microscope for his role in shilling tokens for the FLiK ICO started by rapper TI.
Investors are claiming to have lost over $1.3 million by purchasing “worthless” FLiK tokens promoted by TI and Hart in a series of tweets.
Given the outcome of the Khaled and Mayweather case though, if all Hart did was post a series of tweets about FLiK, the precedent suggests he won’t be found culpable for investors’ losses.
Published May 15, 2019 — 14:05 UTC
Content sourced fromTNW
*This section only applies to third party rss feed users*
— Kashmir Broadcasting Corporation allows the use of RSS Feeds, but with our content usage we expect that credit is given, but in the event that it is not. This content policy annotation will act as a credit towards KBC (Kashmir Broadcasting Corporation) Please visit kbcchannel.tv for more news and articles — we can not justify what is written on a third party site, as the content can be altered to their specification, if something is not authentic as it should be please visit kbcchannel.tv and look for the original content. if it is no longer there then it can no longer be associated with Kashmir Broadcasting Corporation and if the content on a third party site has been altered to the point of offence or deemed inappropriate please report it to KBC via email: firstname.lastname@example.org or fill the submission form on kbc’s website: https://www.kbcchannel.tv/report-form/ with the details of the site and article heading — Thank You
Website — https://www.kbcchannel.tv/
FaceBook — https://www.facebook.com/kbcchanneltv
Twitter — https://twitter.com/kbcchanneltv
YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV6TFLe3dGbavSYilnC2paQ
Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/kbcchanneltv/